<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New in 2.5 (2.6) &#8220;hybrid polygon/free select tool&#8221;!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meetthegimp.org/new-in-25-26-hybrid-polygonfree-select-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meetthegimp.org/new-in-25-26-hybrid-polygonfree-select-tool/</link>
	<description>A videopodcast about the free graphics program Gimp</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: devvv</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/new-in-25-26-hybrid-polygonfree-select-tool/#comment-5278</link>
		<dc:creator>devvv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 10:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/?p=211#comment-5278</guid>
		<description>yeah, david, the tool really rocks now!!! I planned a small 2.5 preview for the website, and the new hybrid-freeselect-tool will be mentioned of course ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, david, the tool really rocks now!!! I planned a small 2.5 preview for the website, and the new hybrid-freeselect-tool will be mentioned of course <img src='http://meetthegimp.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David gowers</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/new-in-25-26-hybrid-polygonfree-select-tool/#comment-5274</link>
		<dc:creator>David gowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/?p=211#comment-5274</guid>
		<description>Personally I have, quite a lot. It's nice to convert the result of a freehand/poly selection to a path to smooth it out. For pure ease of quickly sketching what you want, freehand/poly select is the best; I will still use paths for editing a selection or anything really precise -- for the rest, it's freehand/poly, cause it's just so much faster and more usable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I have, quite a lot. It&#8217;s nice to convert the result of a freehand/poly selection to a path to smooth it out. For pure ease of quickly sketching what you want, freehand/poly select is the best; I will still use paths for editing a selection or anything really precise &#8212; for the rest, it&#8217;s freehand/poly, cause it&#8217;s just so much faster and more usable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew A. Gill, SLS</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/new-in-25-26-hybrid-polygonfree-select-tool/#comment-5264</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew A. Gill, SLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/?p=211#comment-5264</guid>
		<description>You could also use the paths tool.  It doesn't allow anything completely freehand, but otherwise, it's quite useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could also use the paths tool.  It doesn&#8217;t allow anything completely freehand, but otherwise, it&#8217;s quite useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
