<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 028: Are 8 Bit enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/</link>
	<description>A videopodcast about the free graphics program Gimp</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jaims</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-2828</link>
		<dc:creator>jaims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-2828</guid>
		<description>I've found a nice thread on the subject of color depth, gimp, photoshop, ufraw...

Worh a look I think!

http://www.flickr.com/groups/83823859@N00/discuss/72157601779400808/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found a nice thread on the subject of color depth, gimp, photoshop, ufraw&#8230;</p>
<p>Worh a look I think!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/83823859@N00/discuss/72157601779400808/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/83823859@N00/discuss/72157601779400808/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaims</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>jaims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>If I start my ubuntu instead of winxp, do not need to compile a thing, just to apt-get the .deb. I don't get the last version of the thing, but it works fine.

I've seen that the 'add layers' and 'add mask layers' tools don't work like in the Gimp; has anyone found good tutorials or resources for cinepaint?

Not that I'm gonna to switch to cinepaint from Gimp, but learning a bit can't be harmful :-)

Jaims</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I start my ubuntu instead of winxp, do not need to compile a thing, just to apt-get the .deb. I don&#8217;t get the last version of the thing, but it works fine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen that the &#8216;add layers&#8217; and &#8216;add mask layers&#8217; tools don&#8217;t work like in the Gimp; has anyone found good tutorials or resources for cinepaint?</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m gonna to switch to cinepaint from Gimp, but learning a bit can&#8217;t be harmful <img src='http://meetthegimp.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jaims</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaims</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>jaims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>Hi there, great episode, I have truly enjoyed the last episodes I have seen (I started a couple of weeks ago with episode 002, and gonna get soon up to date). Great explanations Joel. Great episode -again- Rolf

I've just downloaded cinepaint, I'll compile it and give it a try, all the same I'll be waiting for the Gimp to be 16 bit (I love it!)

In the meanwhile, the point of Rolf seems good enough tho me; shooting RAW pics and working on RAW, using the Gimp for the fine details...

Saludos,

Jaims</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, great episode, I have truly enjoyed the last episodes I have seen (I started a couple of weeks ago with episode 002, and gonna get soon up to date). Great explanations Joel. Great episode -again- Rolf</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just downloaded cinepaint, I&#8217;ll compile it and give it a try, all the same I&#8217;ll be waiting for the Gimp to be 16 bit (I love it!)</p>
<p>In the meanwhile, the point of Rolf seems good enough tho me; shooting RAW pics and working on RAW, using the Gimp for the fine details&#8230;</p>
<p>Saludos,</p>
<p>Jaims</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meet the GIMP &#171; Ang Pilipino GIMP</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Meet the GIMP &#171; Ang Pilipino GIMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>[...] Episode 028: Are 8 Bit enough? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Episode 028: Are 8 Bit enough? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>Well, I don't NEED 16 bit (it worked up to today with 8), but I WANT 16 bit to have the leeway. But I'll don't switch programs - I'll wait for GIMP to catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t NEED 16 bit (it worked up to today with 8), but I WANT 16 bit to have the leeway. But I&#8217;ll don&#8217;t switch programs - I&#8217;ll wait for GIMP to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the interesting interview. Even though I doubt I'll ever really need the 16-bit, I'm keeping an eye on Krita and PAINT.NET, both of which are 16-bit app.s, if I understand correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interesting interview. Even though I doubt I&#8217;ll ever really need the 16-bit, I&#8217;m keeping an eye on Krita and PAINT.NET, both of which are 16-bit app.s, if I understand correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcornuz</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>jcornuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I think Rolf did a good job a interviewing and editing. I was less than average at explaining :)

@Norman: this is all part of your workflow: if you start with a RAW file and edit / print in 16 bits, you will see a difference from a JPEG from camera edited in 8 bits. 
Now HOW MUCH of a difference will vary on how tricky the image is and how much post-processing is necessary.

Take care,

Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I think Rolf did a good job a interviewing and editing. I was less than average at explaining <img src='http://meetthegimp.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Norman: this is all part of your workflow: if you start with a RAW file and edit / print in 16 bits, you will see a difference from a JPEG from camera edited in 8 bits.<br />
Now HOW MUCH of a difference will vary on how tricky the image is and how much post-processing is necessary.</p>
<p>Take care,</p>
<p>Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffegg2</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffegg2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rolf for another great tutorial/interview. The 8 bit problem is why I mostly shoot raw and then use UFRaw for my initial edits to keep edits mostly in 16 bit. Then using Gimp for just fine adjustments so I don't knarl up the shot with changes. I'm looking forward to a 16 bit gimp. I think photoshop will get a big hit from Gimp if it goes to 16, as that is the biggest argument against using gimp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rolf for another great tutorial/interview. The 8 bit problem is why I mostly shoot raw and then use UFRaw for my initial edits to keep edits mostly in 16 bit. Then using Gimp for just fine adjustments so I don&#8217;t knarl up the shot with changes. I&#8217;m looking forward to a 16 bit gimp. I think photoshop will get a big hit from Gimp if it goes to 16, as that is the biggest argument against using gimp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>I do understand the maths involved and have seen how using the curves tool reduces the number of shades available. I suppose the number of shades available becomes significant if big enlargements are required to be printed or projected but, for the amateur whose images are generally viewed either on a computer or some other digital device, what is the likelihood of  such differences being noticeable? I would like to see an image, produced by an amateur photographer, where it is necessary to make such big changes that the reduction in available shades becomes significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do understand the maths involved and have seen how using the curves tool reduces the number of shades available. I suppose the number of shades available becomes significant if big enlargements are required to be printed or projected but, for the amateur whose images are generally viewed either on a computer or some other digital device, what is the likelihood of  such differences being noticeable? I would like to see an image, produced by an amateur photographer, where it is necessary to make such big changes that the reduction in available shades becomes significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>Rolf

Thanks for the great interview.  Just a quick thumbs up for Joel's website - a great resource.  It was invaluable when trying to set-up my Spyder2Express in  Linux.  Lots of valuable information.

Cheers
Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rolf</p>
<p>Thanks for the great interview.  Just a quick thumbs up for Joel&#8217;s website - a great resource.  It was invaluable when trying to set-up my Spyder2Express in  Linux.  Lots of valuable information.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>Hi Rolf,

I haven't seen the video yet (I'm currently downloading it).  I just wanted to share a recent tutorial I read that explained the 16-bit vs 8-bit issue VERY CLEAR:

http://www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/16-bit/

The tutorial is based on Photoshop but it doesn't matter in this case (if you want to have a clear understanding of why 16-bit is better).

All the best,
Jorge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rolf,</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the video yet (I&#8217;m currently downloading it).  I just wanted to share a recent tutorial I read that explained the 16-bit vs 8-bit issue VERY CLEAR:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/16-bit/" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/16-bit/</a></p>
<p>The tutorial is based on Photoshop but it doesn&#8217;t matter in this case (if you want to have a clear understanding of why 16-bit is better).</p>
<p>All the best,<br />
Jorge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we were not clear enough about that. 

8 bit are enough for looking at. Screens and JPEG don't have more and a lot of printers work also in 8 bit.

But if you start to mangle the colours you do integer math in 8 bit. And that leads to losses due to rounding errors. You get less than 256 different shades in each channel and that starts to become visible as flat areas. Just try to tweak a curve in an image back and forth repeatedly and observe. 

If you mangle the colours in 16 bit you can loose lots of shades and still have more than you'll ever need. Convert that to 8 bit and you have a fine image. 

According to an interview with Sven Neumann GIMP will get 16 bit internal engine parts in the near future. The curves tool would be a good start. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we were not clear enough about that. </p>
<p>8 bit are enough for looking at. Screens and JPEG don&#8217;t have more and a lot of printers work also in 8 bit.</p>
<p>But if you start to mangle the colours you do integer math in 8 bit. And that leads to losses due to rounding errors. You get less than 256 different shades in each channel and that starts to become visible as flat areas. Just try to tweak a curve in an image back and forth repeatedly and observe. </p>
<p>If you mangle the colours in 16 bit you can loose lots of shades and still have more than you&#8217;ll ever need. Convert that to 8 bit and you have a fine image. </p>
<p>According to an interview with Sven Neumann GIMP will get 16 bit internal engine parts in the near future. The curves tool would be a good start. <img src='http://meetthegimp.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1920</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I dozed off or something but I failed to appreciate the differences between 8 bit and 16 bit. Did I miss some examples showing the difference or what? There were some super images though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I dozed off or something but I failed to appreciate the differences between 8 bit and 16 bit. Did I miss some examples showing the difference or what? There were some super images though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m on meetthegimp.org &#171; Linux Photography</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m on meetthegimp.org &#171; Linux Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>[...] Ah, and here is the link. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ah, and here is the link. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf</title>
		<link>http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meetthegimp.org/episode-028-are-8-bit-enough/#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>Well, I should have clicked on "Publish" when I set the timer for publication.... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I should have clicked on &#8220;Publish&#8221; when I set the timer for publication&#8230;. <img src='http://meetthegimp.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
